In 2004 John Kerry lost the presidency by around three million votes. In that race, according to the 2004 CNN exit poll, he got 41% of the white vote. White voters made up 77% of the national electorate. In 2000, Gore carried the popular vote and got 41% of the white vote, again according to the CNN exit poll for 2000. In 2000 white voters made up around 81% of the national electorate. So, in two races, the Democratic candidate was getting around 40 to 41% of the white vote and whites were over three-quarters of the electorate.
This brings us to the 2008 Democratic presidential race. In New Hampshire, Barack Obama got 37% of the total vote. Since New Hampshire is a state that has, according the Census Bureau, a population that is 95.1% white and only 1% African-American, it is a pretty safe bet that almost all of his votes were from white voters. In Iowa 38% of caucus goers chose Obama. Again, like New Hampshire, Iowa is a state that is 93% white, it is again safe to assume that most of his support came from white voters.
Thus, in two races in states that were over 90% white, the best that Obama has done is 38% of the vote.
The issue is whether Obama can do better than that in a national election? Can he get into the 40% of the white vote that both Kerry and Gore got against Bush? Conversely, could he increase the black vote from 11% of the total vote to more like 12 or 13% of the total vote? Given the recent history of two straight presidential defeats where the Democratic candidate only got around 40% of the white vote, the answer to these questions is crucial if Obama is the Democratic nominee.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment