Earlier this month we posted a story about how Regent University posted on its website the fact that 150 of its alumni either worked or had worked for the Bush Administration. As one of our readers pointed out to us that information appears to be gone from the University's website.
Why was this done? The reader suggests three possible reasons: " Could they be embarassed that the public now knows where Bush's advice comes from? Or maybe the info has been removed because of the Gonzalez Attorneys General scandal? Or perhaps they withdrew the info because their claim was overblown/inaccurate?
It would be interesting if someone would call up Regent's University and ask them about this apparent change. If you do, let us know by posting a comment on our blog.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I sent them an email yesterday (I posted as well about their website, but focusing on different issues) asking why Clinton's adultery was so abhorrent to Regent, but Giuiliani's was OK, as evidenced by the fact that they've invited him to speak on Tuesday.
Anyway, I sent them an email (their pr person) asking for an explanation of the apparent double standard. Maybe there's something I'm missing.
Perhaps you didn't look hard enough. http://www.regent.edu/general/about_us/facts.cfm
That same page shows the school is claiming that they won National Competitions against the likes of Yale and Harvard.
I'd like to see what a Google search turns up about those actual competitions.
How could a school be ranked 136th and win National Moot Court and Negotiations Competitions? Come on, they're a bunch of liars.
Post a Comment